Social interactions in the workplace in the light of the social exchange theory:

Main Article Content

Daniella Sousa
Leonardo Pinheiro

Abstract

Abstract: Workplace relationships, according to social exchange theory, offer a perspective for understanding how people interact and develop relationships with their supervisors and colleagues. Thus, the present study aimed to systematize the empirical literature that relates social exchange theory in the organizational context. To this end, a search was conducted in the main databases (Scopus and Web of Science) to analyze the research published in this context based on the use of the 4W’s model of Rosado-Serrano, Paul and Dikova (2018). 73 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria, and 25 of these were selected for the present review, evidencing the existence of studies that corroborate about the subject. As a result, among the social interactions most cited by scholars, pillars that positively affect work relationships, such as commitment, loyalty and trust of employees towards the organization, and arouse in employees organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, effective performance, support and organizational justice, among others, stand out. This study not only reinforces the relationships and relevance of social exchange theory, but also provides empirical support for understanding the experiences and relationships between employees and their supervisors or colleagues, as well as extends the body of research on organizational behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sousa Silva, D., & Pinheiro, L. . (2023). Social interactions in the workplace in the light of the social exchange theory: . Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar, 26(2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1842
Section
Artigo de Revisão
Author Biography

Leonardo Pinheiro, Universidade Federal do Piauí

Abstract: Workplace relationships, according to social exchange theory, offer a
perspective for understanding how people interact and develop relationships with their
supervisors and colleagues. Thus, the present study aimed to systematize the empirical
literature that relates social exchange theory in the organizational context. To this end, a
search was conducted in the main databases (Scopus and Web of Science) to analyze the
research published in this context based on the use of the 4W’s model of Rosado-
Serrano, Paul and Dikova (2018). 73 publications were identified that met the inclusion
criteria, and 25 of these were selected for the present review, evidencing the existence
of studies that corroborate about the subject. As a result, among the social interactions
most cited by scholars, pillars that positively affect work relationships, such as
commitment, loyalty and trust of employees towards the organization, and arouse in
employees organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, effective performance,
support and organizational justice, among others, stand out. This study not only
reinforces the relationships and relevance of social exchange theory, but also provides
empirical support for understanding the experiences and relationships between
employees and their supervisors or colleagues, as well as extends the body of research
on organizational behavior.

References

AHMAD, R.; NAWAZ, M.R.; ISHAQ, M.I.; KHAN, M.M.; ASHRAF, H.A. Social exchange theory: systematic review and future directions. Frontiers In Psychology, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 1-13, 2023.Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921. Acesso em: 8 de fev. de 2023.

ALCOVER, C.; CHAMBEL, M. J.; ESTREDER, Y. Monetary incentives, motivational orientation and affective commitment in contact centers. A multilevel mediation model. Journal of Economic Psychology, [S.l.], v. 81, p. 102-307, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102307. Acesso em: 12 de dez. de 2022.

BLAU, P. Exchange and power in social life. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1964. 387 p.

BOURAOUI, K.; BENSEMMANE, S.; OHANA, M.; RUSSO, M. Corporate social responsibility and employees’ affective commitment: A multiple mediation model. Management Decision, [S.l.], v. 57, n. 1, p. 152-167, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-1015. Acesso em: 27 de dez. de 2022.

BREIDENTHAL, A. P.; LIU, D.; BAI, Y.; MAO, Y. The dark side of creativity: coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, [S.l.], v. 161, p. 242-254, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.001. Acesso em: 12 de dez. de 2022.

BRIEGER, S. A.; ANDERER, S.; FROHLICH, A.; BARO, A.; MEYNHARDT, T. Too Much of a Good Thing? On the Relationship Between CSR and Employee Work Addiction. Journal of Business Ethics, [S.l.], v. 166, n. 2, p. 311-329, 9 mar. 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04141-8. Acesso em: 26 de fev. de 2023.

BRYANT, W.; MERRITT, S. M. Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior and Positive Leader–Employee Relationships. Journal Of Business Ethics, [S.l], v. 168, n. 4, p. 777-793, 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04211-x. Acesso em: 2 de jan. de 2023.

CHAUDHARY, S. I.; BHATTI, O. K.; CIPRAN, H.; BAJWA, A. H. The Conceptual Review on the Impact of Organizational Justice on Workplace Deviance and the Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Breach. International Journal Of Organizational Leadership, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 235-252, 2022. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2022.60328. Acesso em: 6 de jan. de 2023.

CHO, J.; SCHILPZAND, P.; HUANG, L.; PATERSON, T. How and When Humble Leadership Facilitates Employee Job Performance: the roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, [S.l.], v. 28, n. 2, p. 169-184, 7 dez. 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051820979634. Acesso em: 22 de fev. de 2023.

COLLINS, B. Fair? I Don’t Care: examining the moderating effect of workplace cynicism on the relationship between interactional fairness and perceptions of organizational support from a social exchange perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, [S.l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 401-413, 2017. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051816667896. Acesso em: 4 de jan. de 2023.

CROPANZANO, R.; MITCHELL, M. Social Exchange Theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 6, p. 874-900, dez. 2005. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602. Acesso em: 06 de jan. de 2023.

CROPANZANO, R.; ANTHONY, E.L.; DANIELS, S.R.; HALL, A.V. Social Exchange Theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 479-516, 2017. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099. Acesso em: 27 de nov. de 2023.

DAHLING, J. J.; GABRIEL, A. S.; MACGOWAN, Rebecca. Understanding typologies of feedback environment perceptions: a latent profile investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, [S.l.], v. 101, p. 133-148, 2017. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.007. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2023.

ENYINDA, I. E.; MBAH, C. H.; OGBUEHI, A.O. Managing marketing–sales–service relationship conflict in a B2B multinational firm. Thunderbird International Business Review, [S.l.], v. 63, n. 6, p. 719-733, 2021. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tie.22221. Acesso em: 15 de dez. de 2022.

GÄCHTER, S.; FEHR, E.. Collective action as a social exchange. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, [S.l.], v. 39, n. 4, p. 341-369, 1999. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(99)00045-1. Acesso em: 2 de jan. de 2023.

GOK, Kubilay; SUMANTH, J.J.; BOMMER, W.H.; DEMIRTES, O.; ARSLAN, A.; EBERHARD, J.; OZDEMIR, I.; YIGIT, A. You May Not Reap What You Sow: how employees' moral awareness minimizes ethical leadership's positive impact on workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, [S.l.], v. 146, n. 2, p. 257-277, 2017. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3655-7. Acesso em: 28 de dez. de 2022.

GÖTZ, M.; BOLLMANN, G.; O’BOYLE, E. Contextual Undertow of Workplace Deviance by and Within Units: a systematic review. Small Group Research,[S.l.],v. 50, n. 1, p. 39-80, 26 jul. 2018. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496418790044. Acesso em: 20 de fev. de 2023.

HERON, L.; COSEANO, R.; BRUK-LEE, V.. The Indirect Effect of Justice Perceptions on Job Satisfaction Among Hispanic Employees. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, [S.l.],v. 40, n. 4, p. 486-503, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986318789123. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2023.

HOMANS, G. C. Social behavior as an exchange. American Journal of Sociology, [S.l.], v. 63, n. 6, p. 597-606, 1958. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1086/222355. Acesso em: 28 de dez. de 2022.

JIN, M.; MCDONALD, B. Understanding Employee Engagement in the Public Sector: the role of immediate supervisor, perceived organizational support, and learning opportunities. The American Review of Public Administration, [S.l.], v. 47, n. 8, p. 881-897, 2016. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643817. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2023.

KORSGAARD, M.A.; MEGLINO, B.M.; LESTER, S.W.; JEONG, S.S. Paying you back or paying me forward: understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, [S.l.], v. 95, n. 2, p. 277-290, 2010. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018137. Acesso em: 14 de jan. de 2023.

LI, S.; JAIN, K.; TZINI, K.. When Supervisor Support Backfires: the link between perceived supervisor support and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, [S.l.], v. 179, n. 1, p. 133-151, 2021. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04797-1. Acesso em 6 de jan. de 2023.

LIANG, H. Façade creation as a mediator of the influence of psychological contract breach on employee behaviors. International Journal of Selection And Assessment, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 614-624, 2022. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12379. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2023.

LIBORIUS, P.; KIEWITZ, C. When leader humility meets follower competitiveness: relationships with follower affective trust, intended and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, [S.l.], v. 135, p. 103-719, 2022. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103719. Acesso em 11 de fev. de 2023.

LIU, C.; WANG, N.; LIANG, H. Motivating information security policy compliance: the critical role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and organizational commitment. International Journal of Information Management, [S.l.], v. 54, p. 102152, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102152. Acesso em: 22 de fev. de 2023.

MROZ, J.; YOERGER, M.; ALLEN, J. Leadership in Workplace Meetings: the intersection of leadership styles and follower gender. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 309-322, 2018. Disponível em:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750542. Acesso em 28 de dez. de 2022.

PAUL, J.; CRIADO, A. R. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, [S.l.], v. 29, n. 4, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717. Acesso em: 8 de jan. de 2023.

QUADE, M. J.; MCLARTY, B. D.; BONNER, J. M. The influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee bottom-line mentality on leader-member exchange and subsequent employee performance. Human Relations, [S.l.], v. 73, n. 8, p. 1157-1181, 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726719858394. Acesso em: 20 de jan. de 2022.

RADEY, M.; STANLEY, L. “Hands on” versus “empty”: supervision experiences of frontline child welfare workers. Children And Youth Services Review, [S.l.],v. 91, p. 128-136, 2018. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.037. Acesso em: 28 de dez. de 2022.

ROSADO-SERRANO, A.; PAUL, J.; DIKOVA, D. International franchising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research,[S.l.],v. 85, p. 238-257, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049. Acesso em: 8 de jan. de 2023.

SHAHEEN, I; AZADEGAN, A. Friends or Colleagues? Communal and Exchange Relationships During stages of Humanitarian Relief. Production And Operations Management, [S.l.], v. 29, n. 12, p. 2828-2850, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.13254. Acesso em: 28 de jan. de 2023.

SHEN, Y. Differences in the moderating role of supervisors’ and subordinates’ cognition on distributive justice in the relationship between psychological contract and organizational identification. Frontiers In Psychology, [S.l.], v. 13, 2022. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054940. Acesso em: 8 de fev. de 2023.

TUNG, V. W. S.; CHEN, Po-Ju; SCHUCKERT, Markus. Managing customer citizenship behaviour: the moderating roles of employee responsiveness and organizational reassurance. Tourism Management, [S.l.], v. 59, p. 23-35, 2017. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.010. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2023.

WANG, D.; LIU, Y.; CHE-HSICH, Y.; ZHANG, Z. Top‐down and bottom‐up: examining reciprocal relationships between leader humility and team helping behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 7, p. 1240-1250, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2634. Acesso em: 5 de jan. de 2023.

WANG, H.; CHEN, X.; XIE, M. Employee innovative behavior and workplace wellbeing: Leader support for innovation and coworker ostracism as mediators.Frontiers in Psychology, [S.l.], v. 13, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014195. Acesso em: 26 de fev. de 2023.

ZHANG, H.; DU, L.; JIANG, Z. “Loyalty to organizations” or “loyalty to supervisors”? Research on differential leadership and employee loyalty behavior: a perspective of insiders and outsiders. Frontiers In Psychology, [S.l.], v. 13, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971624. Acesso em: 11 de fev. de 2023.